Spectrum Study
Home
Spectrum Study
Methodology
Researcher
Profiles
Selected
Bibliography
Selected
Quotations
About
Spectrum
FAQ

 

Spectrum Initiative Longitudinal Study
 
  Selected Quotations : Oral History  

Diverse Personnel in Libraries

Diversity

Identity

Interviewees

Interviewing

Life History

Memory

Mentoring

Oral Historians: Tasks and Roles

Oral History

Oral History: Definitions

Shared Authority

Spectrum Initiative

Storytelling

Trauma

Validity


  • One of the two things that distinguish oral history from other disciplines is “the search for a connection between biography and history, between individual experience and the transformations of society.” i
  • “… the focus of oral history is to record as complete an interview as possible—an interview which contains, within itself, its own system of structures, not a system derived from the narrow conventions of written history.” ii
  • “I think that oral history is a tool to democratize the study of history.” iii
  • “Just as we work with the interaction between the social and the personal, we also work with the interaction between narrative, imagination, and subjectivity on the one hand, and plausibly ascertained facts on the other.” iv
  • “So what we create is a dialogic text of multiple voices and multiple interpretations: the many interpretations of the interviewees, our interpretations, and the interpretations of the readers.” v
  • “It is this dialectic between the telling of the story and the inquisitive and critical mind, whether of the “professional” historian or of the interested neighbor, which gives oral history its real dimension.” vi
  • “Oral history should be a way to get a better history, a more critical history, a more conscious history which involves members of the public in the creation of their own history.” vii
  • “Because oral history is a way of involving people heretofore uninvolved in the creation of the documents of their past, it is an opportunity to democratize the nature of history not simply by interviewing them but by seeing.that involvement as a prelude to a method which allows people to formulate their own meanings of their past experiences in a structured manner in response to informed criticism.” viii
  • “Oral history is unique in that it creates its own documents, documents that are by definition explicit dialogues about the past, with the “subject” necessarily triangulated between past experience and the present context of remembering.” ix
  • “Narrators articulate memory, evaluation, and anecdote in the dialogues with interviewers who are trying to reconstruct a broader framework and therefore invite them to highlight the encounter between history and their lives, private worlds and events of general interest.” x
  • “Oral history, then, offers less a grid of standard experiences than a horizon of shared possibilities, real or imagined.” xi
  • “By showing people trying to make sense of their lives at a variety of points in time and in a variety of ways, by opening this individual process to view, the oral history reveals patterns and choices that, taken together, begin to define the reinforcing and screening apparatus of the general culture, and the ways in which it encourages us to digest experience.” xii
  • “Oral history is also good at restoring pivotal moments to life, at helping us imagine the drama of impending decisions and their unimaginable consequences, as distinct from the all-too-familiar monuments these decisions become in the landscape of the historical past tense.” xiii

i Portelli, Alessandro, The Battle of Valle Giulia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1997), 6.
ii Grele, Ronald J., “Movement Without Aim: Methodological and Theoretical Problems in Oral History,” In Grele, Ronald J., Envelopes of Sound: The Art of Oral History 2nd ed. (Chicago: Precedent Publishing, 1985), 135.
iii (Ronald J. Grele, , interviewed by Studs Terkel), “It’s Not the Song, It’s the Singing: Panel Discussion on Oral History,” In Grele, Ronald J., Envelopes of Sound: The Art of Oral History 2nd ed (Chicago: Precedent Publishing, 1985), 87.
iv Portelli, Alessandro (The Battle of Valle Guilia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1997), 64.
v Portelli, Alessandro (The Battle of Valle Guilia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1997), 65.
vi Grele, Ronald J., “Preface,” Envelopes of Sound: The Art of Oral History 2nd ed (Chicago: Precedent Publishing, 1985), vii.
vii Grele, Ronald J., “Preface,” Envelopes of Sound: The Art of Oral History 2nd ed (Chicago: Precedent Publishing, 1985), viii
viii Grele, Ronald J., “Preface,” Envelopes of Sound: The Art of Oral History 2nd ed (Chicago: Precedent Publishing, 1985), viii
ix Frisch, Michael, ”Quality in History Programs,” In A Shared Authority: Essays on the Craft and Meaning of Oral and Public History (Albany, NY: Statue University of New York Press, 1990), 188.
x Portelli, Alessandro (The Battle of Valle Guilia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1997), 161.
xi Portelli, Alessandro (The Battle of Valle Guilia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1997), 88.
xii Frisch, Michael, “Oral History and Hard Times,” In A Shared Authority: Essays on the Craft and Meaning of Oral and Public History (Albany, NY: Statue University of New York Press, 1990), 11.
xiii Frisch, Michael, “Oral History, Documentary, and the Mystification of Power,” In A Shared Authority: Essays on the Craft and Meaning of Oral and Public History (Albany, NY: Statue University of New York Press, 1990), 163